When Theory Meets Red Soil: Why Agricultural Development Works Best From the Ground Up

By Staff Reporter.

In 2026 – January, a meeting took place that quietly captured the future of agricultural development in South Africa. Across the table sat officials from the Mpumalanga Economic Growth Agency (MEGA) and a delegation of American and South African students and academics from the University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES) and University of Mpumalanga (UMP), fresh from two weeks of immersion in a MEGA owned farm, Tekwane Citrus Farm in Ehlanzeni. What unfolded was more than a courtesy visit, it was a live case study in how development works when theory meets soil, and policy meets people.

The delegation, led by Professor Benham Khatabi from the University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES), had come not to observe from a distance but to understand agriculture as a lived system. “We came to see what you are doing,” Khatabi explained. “We want to understand how the system runs here, not from a textbook but from the ground up.” That philosophy framed the entire engagement: education not as abstraction, but as experience.

At a time when global food security debates are increasingly dominated by data models and policy papers, MEGA owned and operated farms offered something more instructive: context. Students moved from small family plots to cooperatives and marketplaces, tracing the agricultural value chain as it realistically functions. Their final stop at MEGA was intentional. After witnessing production and struggle, they wanted to understand the machinery of support that determines whether farmers merely survive or sustainably grow.

At the centre of this conversation is Mentorship.

Kenneth Mathebula, a lecturer at the University of Mpumalanga (UMP) and one of the architects of the exchange, articulated the core challenge facing emerging farmers. “That transition from subsistence to sustainability is fragile,” he said. “A successful commercial farmer mentoring a smallholder can make the difference. MEGA is the critical link in that chain.”

This observation cuts to the heart of agricultural development failures across the Global South. Too often, smallholder farmers are treated as isolated beneficiaries rather than participants in an ecosystem. Access to land without access to capital, training, markets, and mentorship is not empowerment, it is exposure to risk.

MEGA’s role, as outlined by Smangele Kwinika, General Manager of the agency’s Funding Division, illustrates a more pragmatic approach. “Traditional banks often see only risk where we see potential,” she explained. By leveraging government funding, MEGA steps into spaces the private sector avoids, offering tailored financial instruments such as contractor finance for farmers with supply agreements and seasonal loans aligned to planting cycles.

Crucially, the emphasis is not simply on disbursing funds but on preparing farmers to succeed. When one student, Javier, posed a question about how access is extended to under-resourced yet passionate individuals, Nkwinika’s response reflected a philosophy that development practitioners would do well to study. “We work with partners to make farmers ‘bank-ready’,” she said, describing a process that includes business skills, record-keeping, and resilience planning in collaboration with the Department of Agriculture and Land Reform.

This approach marks a deliberate shift from charity to partnership. Fixed interest rates as low as five percent are not concessions; they are tools designed to prevent farmers from collapsing under financial pressure before their first harvest reaches market. The goal is not dependency, but durability.

For the University of Mpumalanga delegation, the engagement affirmed their role not as intermediaries, but as stakeholders in a shared mission. That sense of mutual respect, rare in development work was palpable. It also underscored the value of international academic partnerships that prioritise exchange over extraction.

What makes this collaboration noteworthy is not its symbolism, but its substance. A student from Maryland was able to connect the challenges of a farmer in rural Mpumalanga with broader questions of policy design, financial inclusion, and global food systems. Data points acquired faces; theory acquired consequence.

As the delegation continued their journey at the Tekwane Citrus Farm, the lesson was clear: Agricultural development cannot be imported wholesale, nor can it be solved from conference rooms alone. It grows in the spaces where institutions listen, where farmers are treated as entrepreneurs, and where learning moves in both directions.

The partnership between UMP, UMES, and MEGA is not a headline-grabbing intervention. It is something more valuable: a working model of how food security, education, and economic development can align when grounded in respect, realism, and shared commitment.

In an era, hungry for scalable solutions, Mpumalanga offers a reminder: The most fertile ground for growth is often found not in grand strategies, but in sustained relationships, where questions are shared, answers are built together, and potential is cultivated long before it is harvested.

For policymakers and financiers alike, Mpumalanga’s lesson is clear: agricultural growth is not unlocked by capital alone, but by institutions willing to price patience, share risk, and invest in people as seriously as they invest in production.

END.